---
sidebar_position: 4
title: 'Solution For a Better Internet'
hide_title: true
---

![](img/geo_aware2.png)

## Geo Awareness is the Solution for Many of the Internet Problems

### The Problems

- [Compare Electricity](../internet_today/compare_electricity.md) - Compares the inefficiency of relying on distant internet infrastructure to the absurdity of using electricity generated on the other side of the world.
- [Internet Basics](../internet_today/internet_basics.md) - Explains the three fundamental layers of the internet: compute/AI/storage, network, and applications, highlighting current centralization issues.
- [Centralization Risk](../internet_today/centralization_risk.md) - Details the dangers of relying on centralized infrastructure and services, using real-world examples like the Ukraine conflict.
- [The Race For Intelligence](../internet_today/ai.md) - Discusses how AI agents will replace traditional apps within 2 years and the implications of centralized AI development.
- [GDP Negative Impact](../internet_today/gdp_negative.md) - Reveals how the current internet structure causes economic losses for developing nations, with case studies showing billions in yearly losses.
- [Internet Protocol Is Broken](../internet_today/internet_risk.md) - Explains why TCP/IP's outdated design is inadequate for modern internet needs and explores RINA as a potential solution.
- [Painkillers Approach](../internet_today/onion_analogy.md) - Uses an onion analogy to illustrate how adding layers to internet infrastructure masks symptoms rather than solving core problems.


**The following table shows how the problems as listed above are fixed because of geo awareness.**


| **Problem Area**                   | **Web2**                                                                                              | **Web3**                                                                             | **Web 0 = Geo-Aware**                                                                                 |
| ---------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Centralization**                 | Dominated by a few corporations; creates fragility and dependency. | Often more Decentralized, but lacks local autonomy; often relies on centralized validators and still datacenters.     | Fully decentralized and location-specific, empowering local infrastructure and sovereignty.   |
| **Data Sovereignty**               | Data stored in centralized data centers controlled by corporations.                                   | Decentralized storage, but users often lack control over physical location.          | Users choose specific locations for data storage, ensuring sovereignty and privacy.           |
| **Infrastructure Resilience**      | Vulnerable to disasters, geopolitical issues, and single points of failure.                           | Often less resilient compared to Web2.                      | Shortest physical paths and local redundancies ensure continued operation during disruptions. New paths are found when needed even by using nodes from your friends. |
| **Economic Impact (GDP Negative)** | High costs for infrastructure; revenue flows to global platforms.                                     | The validators are still too centralized and often hosted in centralized datanceters. Too complicated and too early days to help right now. | Localized infrastructure boosts regional economies, keeping revenue within countries.         |
| **Internet Efficiency**            | Long data routes; underutilized hardware; inefficient layers.                                         | Reliant on outdated protocols, vulnerable because of used ledger tech and layered inefficiencies. | Shortest paths reduce latency and cost; full hardware optimization ensures efficiency.        |
| **Security and Transparency**      | Complex, security by smart employees of the corporations.                                             | Smart contracts improve security, but issues remain as code upgrade path.                            | Transparent and tamper-proof deployments ensure security and resilience.                      |
| **Layer Complexity**               | Redundant layers create inefficiencies and fragility.                                                 | Often web3 is more complex compared to web 2.                     | Simplifies architecture by localizing compute, storage, and networking. 10x less development effort is possible                       |
| **Application Hosting**            | Hosted in large centralized data centers, increasing latency and cost.                                | Sometimes, decentralized hosting but not geographically optimized.                              | Applications can be hosted locally, reducing latency and ensuring autonomy.                   |
| **Access Inequality**              | Over 50% of the world lacks reliable access.                                                          | Expands access but without addressing local infrastructure challenges.               | Geo-aware systems build localized, affordable infrastructure to improve access.               |
| **Session Management**             | Breaks under interruptions; no native continuity.                                                     | Some continuity improvements via decentralized protocols.                            | Built-in session management ensures reliability even during disruptions.                      |



## Challenges in the Current Depin (Decentralized Internet) World

Despite advancements in decentralized technology, geo-awareness remains under-prioritized. 

Current Web3 solutions focus on decentralization without accounting for the geographic efficiency or sovereignty that geo-awareness offers.

---

## Comparison Table: Current Web3 Solutions vs. Geo-Aware Systems


| **Feature**             | **Current Web3 Solutions**                              | **Geo-Awareness**                                        |
| ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Storage**             | Global, often randomly distributed without user control | Users choose storage locations; data remains sovereign   |
| **Compute**             | Decentralized but lacks location-specific optimization  | Compute occurs at chosen locations; optimized for region |
| **Network**             | Relies on global, non-optimized routing                 | Shortest physical path for communication                 |
| **Ledger**              | Public blockchains are unreliable in case of network issues          | Location-aware sovereign ledgers for national and local control    |
| **Resilience**          | Vulnerable to global internet disruptions               | Independent operation during outages                     |
| **Application Control** | Limited transparency on app deployment locations and upgrade paths        | Full control and visibility of app deployment            |
| **Data Integrity**      | Prone to distributed risks and complexities             | Tamper-proof, user-controlled data access                |


---

## Why Geo-Awareness Matters

The current centralized and globalized digital architecture exacerbates inefficiencies, compromises sovereignty, and creates economic dependencies. Geo-awareness addresses these problems by creating a decentralized yet location-sensitive framework. This ensures that infrastructure is resilient, secure, and operates in harmony with the physical realities of the world, ultimately empowering users and nations alike.