,...
This commit is contained in:
30
specs/0_structure_vision.md
Normal file
30
specs/0_structure_vision.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
# Website Vision and Structure
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose of the Site
|
||||
|
||||
The purpose of the OurWorld Coop website is to introduce and attract members, users, and investors to a new digital ecosystem built on the principles of sovereignty, decentralization, and collective intelligence.
|
||||
|
||||
The website serves as the primary informational and onboarding platform for a multi-faceted initiative that includes:
|
||||
|
||||
- **OurWorld Coop:** A cooperative movement for a new, fair, and user-owned internet.
|
||||
- **HERO:** A sovereign, personal AI companion that acts as the user's agent in the digital world.
|
||||
- **Digital Freezone:** A sovereign digital territory providing a unique legal and governance framework.
|
||||
- **OurWorld Venture Creator:** A holding company designed to fund and scale the technologies and ventures that form the foundation of this new internet.
|
||||
|
||||
The site aims to communicate a compelling vision for a better digital future and provide clear pathways for different audiences to get involved, whether by becoming a cooperative member, registering interest in the HERO product, or exploring investment opportunities.
|
||||
|
||||
## Website Structure
|
||||
|
||||
The website is structured across several key pages, each designed to address a specific aspect of the OurWorld ecosystem and guide different user journeys.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Homepage (`/`):** Serves as the main entry point, providing a high-level overview of the entire vision. It introduces the core problems with the current internet and presents OurWorld Coop as the solution. It briefly touches on HERO and the Digital Freezone and directs users to learn more or become a member.
|
||||
|
||||
- **HERO (`/hero`):** This page focuses exclusively on the HERO product. It details what HERO is (a sovereign AI companion), why it matters (a shift towards collective intelligence), what it can do for the user (learn, heal, create), and the principles it's built on (privacy, cultural relevance).
|
||||
|
||||
- **How It Works (`/how-it-works`):** This page delves into the technical architecture of HERO. It explains that HERO runs on the ThreeFold Grid, a decentralized internet, and details the security, sovereignty, and resilience features this provides. It's aimed at a more technically-minded audience.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Digital Freezone (`/digital-freezone`):** This page explains the unique governance and legal foundation of the OurWorld ecosystem. It defines what a digital freezone is and describes its core components: digital sovereignty, cooperative governance, and fair dispute resolution.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Venture Creator (`/holding`):** This page targets potential investors. It introduces OurWorld Venture Creator, a holding company that funds a portfolio of synergistic startups building the new internet. It outlines the investment opportunity, the portfolio companies, and the path to a potential IPO.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Become a Member (`/register`):** This is the primary call-to-action page for joining the cooperative. It details the membership offer ($20/month) and provides a multi-step form for users to register their interest and eventually make a payment.
|
114
specs/1_homepage.md
Normal file
114
specs/1_homepage.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
|
||||
# Page: Homepage - ThreeFold Tier-S & Tier-H Datacenters
|
||||
|
||||
## Why This Page Exists
|
||||
|
||||
This is the main landing page for ThreeFold's decentralized datacenter solutions. Its purpose is to introduce the revolutionary concept of Tier-S and Tier-H datacenters, demonstrate the value proposition of transforming real estate into digital infrastructure, and drive visitors toward learning more about products or registering interest. It positions ThreeFold as the leader in decentralized, sovereign digital infrastructure.
|
||||
|
||||
## Target Audience
|
||||
|
||||
The target audience consists of:
|
||||
- Real estate developers and property owners seeking new revenue streams
|
||||
- Government officials and policymakers interested in digital sovereignty
|
||||
- Telecom companies and ISPs looking to deploy local compute grids
|
||||
- Enterprise developers and startups seeking cloud independence
|
||||
- AI and Web3 companies needing scalable, cost-effective infrastructure
|
||||
- Communities seeking digital resilience and sovereignty
|
||||
|
||||
## What We Want to Say
|
||||
|
||||
The core message is that traditional centralized datacenters are obsolete. ThreeFold offers a better alternative through decentralized Tier-S and Tier-H datacenters that transform buildings into digital utilities, providing sovereign, resilient, and energy-efficient infrastructure that keeps data local and generates passive revenue.
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Breakdown
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Hero Section: The Future of Digital Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** A bold opening about revolutionizing digital infrastructure through decentralized datacenters that transform real estate into digital utilities.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> Transform Your Building Into a Digital Powerhouse. The Future of Infrastructure is Decentralized.
|
||||
> ThreeFold Tier-S & Tier-H Datacenters turn homes, offices, and buildings into sovereign digital infrastructure. Generate passive revenue while providing resilient, local cloud and AI services that keep data where it belongs - under your control.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. What Are Tier-S and Tier-H?
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Clear explanation of the two datacenter types and their applications.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Tier-S Datacenters:** Modular, industrial-grade containers that handle over 1 million transactions per second and support 100,000+ users per unit. Perfect for industrial-scale AI and cloud deployment.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Tier-H Datacenters:** Plug-and-play nodes for homes, offices, and mixed-use spaces. Provide full compute, storage, and networking with ultra energy-efficiency (<10W per node) and zero maintenance.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. From Real Estate to Digital Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Analogy to solar panels and explanation of the transformation opportunity.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> Just Like Solar Panels Transform Buildings Into Power Generators, ThreeFold Nodes Transform Them Into Digital Utilities.
|
||||
> Your building can produce:
|
||||
> - Compute, storage, and networking capacity
|
||||
> - AI inference power
|
||||
> - Recurring digital revenue
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Compute is now one of the world's most valuable resources. Sovereign infrastructure is the new standard.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Why Real Estate Developers Should Join
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Clear value proposition with concrete benefits.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Passive Digital Revenue:** Monetize idle compute, bandwidth, and storage
|
||||
> **Higher Property Value:** Market properties as cloud-enabled
|
||||
> **Green & Resilient:** 10x less energy vs traditional datacenters
|
||||
> **Turnkey Deployment:** No IT expertise required
|
||||
> **Sovereign Cloud:** Data stays local and private
|
||||
> **Future-Proof:** Supports AI, Web3, digital twins, and modern applications
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Technical Advantages
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Key differentiators that make ThreeFold superior.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Built on Revolutionary Technology:**
|
||||
> - Zero-OS: Stateless, self-healing operating system
|
||||
> - Quantum-Safe Storage: Unbreakable data protection with 10x efficiency
|
||||
> - Mycelium Network: Mesh networking that routes around failures
|
||||
> - Smart Contract for IT: Autonomous, cryptographically secured deployments
|
||||
> - Geo-Aware AI: Private AI agents that respect boundaries and sovereignty
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Real Cost Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Concrete cost advantages to demonstrate value.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Dramatic Cost Savings:**
|
||||
> - Storage (1TB + 100GB Transfer): Less than $5/month vs $12–$160/month elsewhere
|
||||
> - Compute (2 vCPU, 4GB RAM): Less than $12/month vs $20–$100/month elsewhere
|
||||
> - Up to 10x more energy efficient than traditional datacenters
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Who It's For
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Clear target markets and use cases.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Perfect For:**
|
||||
> - Governments building sovereign AI and cloud infrastructure
|
||||
> - Telecoms and ISPs deploying local compute grids
|
||||
> - Developers and startups seeking cloud independence
|
||||
> - AI and Web3 companies hosting inference or full-stack apps
|
||||
> - Communities seeking plug-and-play digital resilience
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Proven at Scale
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Social proof and current deployment statistics.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Already Deployed Globally:**
|
||||
> - Live in over 50 countries
|
||||
> - 60,000+ CPU cores active
|
||||
> - Over 1 million contracts processed on-chain
|
||||
> - Proven technology stack in production for years
|
||||
>
|
||||
> View live statistics: [https://stats.grid.tf](https://stats.grid.tf)
|
||||
|
||||
### 9. Call to Action
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Clear next steps for different audience segments.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Ready to Transform Your Infrastructure?**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **For Real Estate Developers:** Deploy Tier-H nodes and start earning digital revenue
|
||||
> **For Enterprises:** Scale with Tier-S datacenters for your region
|
||||
> **For Everyone:** Join the most resilient, inclusive, and intelligent internet
|
||||
>
|
||||
> The future of digital infrastructure starts with your building.
|
201
specs/2_products.md
Normal file
201
specs/2_products.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
|
||||
# Page: Products - ThreeFold Datacenter Solutions
|
||||
|
||||
## Why This Page Exists
|
||||
|
||||
This page provides detailed information about ThreeFold's two main products: Tier-S and Tier-H. It serves as a comprehensive product catalog that helps visitors understand the technical specifications, use cases, and deployment options for each solution. The page enables informed decision-making by providing clear comparisons and detailed feature breakdowns.
|
||||
|
||||
## Target Audience
|
||||
|
||||
The target audience consists of:
|
||||
- Technical decision-makers evaluating infrastructure solutions
|
||||
- Real estate developers assessing deployment options
|
||||
- IT professionals and system architects
|
||||
- Government officials planning digital infrastructure
|
||||
- Telecom companies considering edge deployment
|
||||
- Enterprise customers evaluating cloud alternatives
|
||||
- Investors and partners seeking technical details
|
||||
|
||||
## What We Want to Say
|
||||
|
||||
We want to communicate that ThreeFold offers two complementary datacenter solutions that can be deployed individually or together to create a complete decentralized infrastructure ecosystem. Each product is designed for specific use cases while sharing the same revolutionary underlying technology stack.
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Breakdown
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Product Overview Hero
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Introduction to the two-tier product strategy and how they work together.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
**Two Solutions, Infinite Possibilities**
|
||||
ThreeFold's datacenter solutions scale from residential deployments to industrial infrastructure, all powered by the same revolutionary technology stack.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Tier-H Datacenters: Residential & Office Scale
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Detailed breakdown of the smaller-scale solution.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Tier-H: Plug-and-Play Digital Infrastructure**
|
||||
|
||||
**Perfect For:**
|
||||
- Homes, offices, and mixed-use buildings
|
||||
- Edge computing and local AI processing
|
||||
- Community networks and local services
|
||||
- Development and testing environments
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Specifications:**
|
||||
- Full compute, storage, and networking capabilities
|
||||
- Zero-touch deployment and maintenance
|
||||
- Supports AI workloads, Web2/Web3 applications
|
||||
- Compatible with Kubernetes and container platforms
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Benefits:**
|
||||
- Plug-and-play installation
|
||||
- Zero maintenance required
|
||||
- Generate passive income from unused capacity
|
||||
- Local data sovereignty
|
||||
- Resilient to internet outages
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Tier-S Datacenters: Industrial Scale
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Comprehensive overview of the enterprise-grade solution.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
**Tier-S: Industrial-Grade Modular Datacenters**
|
||||
|
||||
**Perfect For:**
|
||||
- Government digital infrastructure
|
||||
- Telecom edge deployment
|
||||
- Enterprise private clouds
|
||||
- AI training and inference at scale
|
||||
- Regional cloud service providers
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Specifications:**
|
||||
- Modular container-based design
|
||||
- Handle 1+ million transactions per second
|
||||
- Support 100,000+ concurrent users per unit
|
||||
- Deployed in under six months
|
||||
- Cyberpandemic and disaster-resilient
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Benefits:**
|
||||
- Rapid deployment compared to traditional datacenters
|
||||
- Complete sovereignty over data and operations
|
||||
- Scales horizontally without limits
|
||||
- Built-in redundancy and self-healing
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Technology Stack Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Side-by-side comparison of capabilities.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
**Shared Technology Foundation:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature | Tier-H | Tier-S |
|
||||
| --------------------- | ---------- | --------------- |
|
||||
| Zero-OS | ✓ | ✓ |
|
||||
| Quantum-Safe Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
|
||||
| Mycelium Network | ✓ | ✓ |
|
||||
| Smart Contract for IT | ✓ | ✓ |
|
||||
| AI/ML Support | ✓ | ✓ |
|
||||
| Kubernetes Compatible | ✓ | ✓ |
|
||||
| Energy Efficiency | Ultra-High | High |
|
||||
| Deployment Time | Minutes | Months |
|
||||
| Maintenance | Zero-touch | Minimal |
|
||||
| Scale | Local/Edge | Regional/Global |
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Use Case Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Clear mapping of products to specific use cases.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Choose Your Deployment Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Tier-H Ideal For:**
|
||||
- Personal AI assistants and agents
|
||||
- Local file storage and backup
|
||||
- Home automation and IoT
|
||||
- Small business applications
|
||||
- Development environments
|
||||
- Community mesh networks
|
||||
|
||||
**Tier-S Ideal For:**
|
||||
- National digital infrastructure
|
||||
- Regional cloud services
|
||||
- Large-scale AI training
|
||||
- Enterprise private clouds
|
||||
- Telecom edge computing
|
||||
- Disaster recovery centers
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Deployment Models
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Different ways to implement the solutions.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
**Flexible Deployment Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Single Node Deployment:**
|
||||
- Start with one Tier-H node
|
||||
- Perfect for testing and small applications
|
||||
- Scales by adding more nodes
|
||||
|
||||
**Hybrid Deployment:**
|
||||
- Combine Tier-H and Tier-S
|
||||
- Edge processing with centralized coordination
|
||||
- Optimal for distributed organizations
|
||||
|
||||
**Regional Grid:**
|
||||
- Multiple Tier-S datacenters
|
||||
- Geo-distributed for sovereignty
|
||||
- Enterprise-grade redundancy
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Economic Model
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Revenue and cost structure for each product.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
**Investment and Returns:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Tier-H Economics:**
|
||||
- Low initial investment
|
||||
- Immediate revenue from spare capacity
|
||||
- ROI typically within 12-24 months
|
||||
- Minimal operational costs
|
||||
|
||||
**Tier-S Economics:**
|
||||
- Higher initial investment
|
||||
- Enterprise-grade revenue potential
|
||||
- 3x higher ROI compared to traditional datacenters
|
||||
- Significantly lower operational costs
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Support and Services
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** What comes with each product offering.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
**Complete Support Ecosystem:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Included with Every Deployment:**
|
||||
- Technical documentation and training
|
||||
- Community support forums
|
||||
- Regular software updates
|
||||
- Monitoring and analytics tools
|
||||
|
||||
**Enterprise Services (Tier-S):**
|
||||
- Dedicated technical support
|
||||
- Custom integration services
|
||||
- SLA guarantees
|
||||
- Professional consulting
|
||||
|
||||
### 9. Getting Started
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Clear next steps for each product.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
**Ready to Deploy?**
|
||||
|
||||
**Start with Tier-H:**
|
||||
- Order your first node
|
||||
- Plug in and start earning
|
||||
- Scale as you grow
|
||||
|
||||
**Scale with Tier-S:**
|
||||
- Schedule a consultation
|
||||
- Custom deployment planning
|
||||
- Professional installation and setup
|
||||
|
||||
**Both Options:**
|
||||
- Join our partner network
|
||||
- Access technical resources
|
||||
- Connect with the community
|
269
specs/3_technology.md
Normal file
269
specs/3_technology.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
|
||||
# Page: Technology - ThreeFold's Revolutionary Infrastructure Stack
|
||||
|
||||
## Why This Page Exists
|
||||
|
||||
This page provides an in-depth technical explanation of ThreeFold's revolutionary technology stack that powers both Tier-S and Tier-H datacenters. It serves to educate technical audiences about the fundamental innovations that make ThreeFold's approach superior to traditional cloud infrastructure, while building credibility through detailed technical explanations and comparisons.
|
||||
|
||||
## Target Audience
|
||||
|
||||
The target audience consists of:
|
||||
- Technical architects and infrastructure engineers
|
||||
- CTOs and technical decision-makers
|
||||
- System administrators and DevOps professionals
|
||||
- Academic researchers and technology analysts
|
||||
- Security professionals and compliance officers
|
||||
- AI/ML engineers and data scientists
|
||||
|
||||
## What We Want to Say
|
||||
|
||||
We want to communicate that ThreeFold has fundamentally reimagined cloud infrastructure from first principles, creating breakthrough innovations in compute, storage, and networking that solve the core problems of centralized systems. Our technology is not just incrementally better—it represents a paradigm shift toward truly decentralized, autonomous, and efficient infrastructure.
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Breakdown
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Technology Hero Section
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Bold statement about revolutionary approach to infrastructure.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Infrastructure Reimagined from First Principles**
|
||||
> ThreeFold's technology stack represents the most significant advancement in cloud infrastructure since virtualization. Built on breakthrough innovations in compute, storage, and networking that solve the fundamental problems of centralized systems.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Core Technology Pillars
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Overview of the three main technology innovations.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Three Pillars of Innovation:**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Zero-OS Compute System**
|
||||
> - Stateless, autonomous operating system
|
||||
> - Depending the usecase can more efficient than traditional systems
|
||||
> - Self-healing and cryptographically secured
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Quantum-Safe Storage**
|
||||
> - Mathematical data dispersion (not replication)
|
||||
> - 20% overhead vs 400% in traditional systems
|
||||
> - Unbreakable and self-healing architecture
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Mycelium Network**
|
||||
> - Peer-to-peer mesh overlay network
|
||||
> - End-to-end encryption with shortest path routing
|
||||
> - Resilient to internet failures and attacks
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Zero-OS: Autonomous Compute
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Deep dive into the revolutionary operating system.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Zero-OS: The World's First Stateless Cloud OS**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Core Principles:**
|
||||
> - **Autonomy:** Operates without human maintenance
|
||||
> - **Simplicity:** Minimal 40MB footprint with only essential components
|
||||
> - **Stateless Design:** No persistent local state, immune to corruption
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Revolutionary Features:**
|
||||
> - **Zero-Install:** Boots from network, no local installation
|
||||
> - **Zero-Images:** Container images 1000x smaller (2MB vs 2GB)
|
||||
> - **Smart Contract for IT:** Cryptographically secured deployments
|
||||
> - **Deterministic Execution:** Reproducible, tamper-proof workloads
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Technical Advantages:**
|
||||
> - Depending workload can eliminates upto 90% of context switching overhead
|
||||
> - Cryptographic verification of all components
|
||||
> - Self-healing and autonomous operation
|
||||
> - Compatible with Docker, Kubernetes, and VMs
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Quantum-Safe Storage: Unbreakable Data
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Explanation of the mathematical storage breakthrough.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Quantum-Safe Storage: Mathematics Over Replication**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **How It Works:**
|
||||
> - Data is fragmented and transformed into mathematical equations
|
||||
> - Equations are distributed across multiple nodes
|
||||
> - Original data fragments are discarded
|
||||
> - Any subset of equations can reconstruct the original data
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Example (Simplified):**
|
||||
> ```
|
||||
> Original fragments: a=1, b=2, c=3
|
||||
> Generated equations:
|
||||
> - a+b+c=6
|
||||
> - c-b-a=0
|
||||
> - 2b+a-c=2
|
||||
> - 5c-b-a=12
|
||||
> ```
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Production Configuration (16/4):**
|
||||
> - 16 data fragments become 20 equations
|
||||
> - Only 16 equations needed for reconstruction
|
||||
> - Can lose any 4 nodes without data loss
|
||||
> - 20% overhead vs 400% in traditional systems
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Zero-Knowledge Architecture:**
|
||||
> - No single node knows what it stores
|
||||
> - Cryptographic proof without data exposure
|
||||
> - Post-quantum security resistant
|
||||
> - Self-healing against bitrot and failures
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Mycelium Network: Intelligent Connectivity
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Technical deep dive into the networking innovation.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Mycelium: The Internet's Missing Layer**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Core Capabilities:**
|
||||
> - **End-to-End Encryption:** Data encrypted at source, decrypted at destination
|
||||
> - **Shortest Path Routing:** Dynamic optimization based on latency, bandwidth, reliability
|
||||
> - **Multi-Hop Transmission:** Resilient routing through intermediate nodes
|
||||
> - **Geographic Awareness:** Physical location optimization
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Technical Implementation:**
|
||||
> - Peer-to-peer mesh topology
|
||||
> - Up to 1 Gbps throughput per agent
|
||||
> - Wire-speed performance in infrastructure (100+ Gbps)
|
||||
> - Protocol-agnostic data transport
|
||||
> - Authentication-based security (not perimeter-based)
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Beyond Traditional Networking:**
|
||||
> - Survives internet outages and failures
|
||||
> - Routes around censorship and blocking
|
||||
> - Enables true peer-to-peer applications
|
||||
> - Reduces latency through optimal path selection
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Architectural Innovations
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** How the technologies work together.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Integrated Architecture: Greater Than Sum of Parts**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Geo-Aware Infrastructure:**
|
||||
> - Data sovereignty with precise location control
|
||||
> - Compliance with local regulations (GDPR, etc.)
|
||||
> - Shortest physical paths for efficiency
|
||||
> - Resilient to geopolitical disruptions
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Smart Contract for IT:**
|
||||
> - Cryptographically secured deployments
|
||||
> - Multi-signature authentication
|
||||
> - Immutable execution records on blockchain
|
||||
> - Autonomous management without human intervention
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Energy Efficiency Breakthrough:**
|
||||
> - Up to 10x less energy than traditional datacenters
|
||||
> - Optimized hardware utilization
|
||||
> - Reduced data movement and processing overhead
|
||||
> - Green computing at planetary scale
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Technical Comparisons
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Side-by-side comparison with traditional approaches.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **ThreeFold vs Traditional Infrastructure:**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> | Aspect | Traditional Cloud | ThreeFold |
|
||||
> |--------|------------------|-----------|
|
||||
> | **OS Deployment** | Local installation, complex updates | Network boot, stateless |
|
||||
> | **Container Images** | 2GB+ monolithic images | 2MB metadata-only |
|
||||
> | **Storage Redundancy** | 400% overhead (4 copies) | 20% overhead (math) |
|
||||
> | **Network Security** | Perimeter-based firewalls | End-to-end encryption |
|
||||
> | **Management** | Human administrators | Autonomous agents |
|
||||
> | **Scalability** | Vertical, expensive | Horizontal, unlimited |
|
||||
> | **Energy Efficiency** | High consumption | 10x more efficient |
|
||||
> | **Data Sovereignty** | Limited control | Complete control |
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Implementation Status & Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Current status and future developments.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Production-Ready Technology:**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Currently Available:**
|
||||
> - Zero-OS Core: Production (multiple years)
|
||||
> - Quantum-Safe Storage: Production
|
||||
> - Mycelium Network: Beta (v3.13+)
|
||||
> - Web Gateway: Production
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Coming H2 2025:**
|
||||
> - Smart Contract for IT: General availability
|
||||
> - Geo-Aware AI Agents (3AI)
|
||||
> - 3CORE Ledger: Geo-fenced blockchain
|
||||
> - FungiStor: Global content delivery
|
||||
> - Enhanced enterprise features
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Live Deployment Stats:**
|
||||
> - 2000+ nodes across 70+ countries
|
||||
> - 60,000+ CPU cores active
|
||||
> - 1+ million contracts processed
|
||||
> - Petabytes of data stored safely
|
||||
|
||||
### 9. Open Source & Standards
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Commitment to openness and interoperability.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Built on Open Principles:**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Open Source Components:**
|
||||
> - Core technology stack available on GitHub
|
||||
> - Community-driven development
|
||||
> - Transparent security auditing
|
||||
> - No vendor lock-in
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Standards Compliance:**
|
||||
> - POSIX filesystem compatibility
|
||||
> - Docker and Kubernetes support
|
||||
> - Standard networking protocols
|
||||
> - Blockchain interoperability
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Developer Ecosystem:**
|
||||
> - Comprehensive APIs and SDKs
|
||||
> - Extensive documentation
|
||||
> - Active community support
|
||||
> - Regular hackathons and events
|
||||
|
||||
### 10. Security & Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Advanced security features and compliance capabilities.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Security by Design:**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Cryptographic Foundation:**
|
||||
> - End-to-end encryption everywhere
|
||||
> - Post-quantum cryptography ready
|
||||
> - Zero-knowledge data storage
|
||||
> - Immutable audit trails
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Compliance Features:**
|
||||
> - GDPR compliance through data sovereignty
|
||||
> - Regulatory jurisdiction control
|
||||
> - Audit-ready transaction logs
|
||||
> - Data residency guarantees
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Threat Resistance:**
|
||||
> - Immune to ransomware (stateless OS)
|
||||
> - DDoS resistant (distributed architecture)
|
||||
> - Quantum computing resistant
|
||||
> - Censorship resistant networking
|
||||
|
||||
### 11. Technical Resources
|
||||
|
||||
* **Learn more at [https://info.ourworld.tf/tech](https://info.ourworld.tf/tech)**
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Dive Deeper:**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Technical Documentation:**
|
||||
> - Architecture whitepapers
|
||||
> - API documentation
|
||||
> - Deployment guides
|
||||
> - Best practices
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Try It Yourself:**
|
||||
> - Live dashboard: [https://dashboard.grid.tf](https://dashboard.grid.tf)
|
||||
> - GitHub repositories
|
||||
> - Developer sandbox
|
||||
> - Community forums
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Get Support:**
|
||||
> - Technical community
|
||||
> - Professional services
|
||||
> - Training programs
|
||||
> - Certification paths
|
281
specs/4_register_interest.md
Normal file
281
specs/4_register_interest.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
|
||||
# Page: Register Interest - Join the ThreeFold Revolution
|
||||
|
||||
## Why This Page Exists
|
||||
|
||||
This page serves as the primary conversion point for visitors who want to get involved with ThreeFold's datacenter solutions. It captures leads, qualifies prospects, and provides clear pathways for different types of stakeholders to engage with ThreeFold. The page is designed to convert interest into actionable next steps while collecting valuable information for follow-up.
|
||||
|
||||
## Target Audience
|
||||
|
||||
The target audience consists of:
|
||||
- Real estate developers and property owners ready to deploy
|
||||
- Government officials exploring digital sovereignty options
|
||||
- Enterprise customers evaluating infrastructure alternatives
|
||||
- Telecom companies considering edge deployment
|
||||
- Investors interested in the ThreeFold ecosystem
|
||||
- Technology partners seeking integration opportunities
|
||||
- Community leaders wanting local digital infrastructure
|
||||
- Individual enthusiasts wanting to participate
|
||||
|
||||
## What We Want to Say
|
||||
|
||||
We want to communicate that ThreeFold is ready to work with serious partners and customers to deploy revolutionary datacenter solutions. Whether someone wants to start small with a single Tier-H node or deploy large-scale Tier-S infrastructure, we have clear pathways to get started and comprehensive support to ensure success.
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Breakdown
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Hero Section: Join the Revolution
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Compelling call to action that emphasizes the opportunity.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Ready to Transform Your Infrastructure?**
|
||||
> Join the growing network of forward-thinking organizations building the future of decentralized digital infrastructure. From single nodes to regional grids, we'll help you deploy sovereign, profitable, and resilient datacenter solutions.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Choose Your Path
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Clear segmentation of different interest types.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **How Do You Want to Get Involved?**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **🏢 Real Estate Developer**
|
||||
> Transform your properties into digital utilities
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **🏛️ Government/Public Sector**
|
||||
> Build sovereign digital infrastructure
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **🏢 Enterprise Customer**
|
||||
> Deploy private, secure cloud infrastructure
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **📡 Telecom/ISP**
|
||||
> Extend your network with edge computing
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **💰 Investor/Partner**
|
||||
> Join the ThreeFold ecosystem
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **🏠 Individual/Community**
|
||||
> Start with residential deployment
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Real Estate Developer Section
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Specific value proposition and next steps for property owners.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **For Real Estate Developers & Property Owners**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **What You Get:**
|
||||
> - Passive digital revenue from your properties
|
||||
> - Higher property values and competitive differentiation
|
||||
> - Future-proof infrastructure for tenants
|
||||
> - Minimal investment with quick ROI
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Next Steps:**
|
||||
> - Property assessment and feasibility study
|
||||
> - Custom deployment planning
|
||||
> - Installation and configuration
|
||||
> - Ongoing revenue optimization
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Information We Need:**
|
||||
> - Property type and size
|
||||
> - Location and connectivity
|
||||
> - Investment timeline
|
||||
> - Revenue expectations
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Government/Public Sector Section
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Sovereignty and compliance benefits for government entities.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **For Government & Public Sector**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **What You Get:**
|
||||
> - Complete digital sovereignty and data control
|
||||
> - Compliance with local regulations and requirements
|
||||
> - Resilient infrastructure immune to external disruption
|
||||
> - Significant cost savings compared to traditional solutions
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Next Steps:**
|
||||
> - Strategic consultation and planning
|
||||
> - Pilot deployment and testing
|
||||
> - Phased rollout and scaling
|
||||
> - Training and knowledge transfer
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Information We Need:**
|
||||
> - Jurisdiction and regulatory requirements
|
||||
> - Current infrastructure and challenges
|
||||
> - Timeline and budget parameters
|
||||
> - Specific use cases and requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Enterprise Customer Section
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Private cloud and security benefits for enterprises.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **For Enterprise Customers**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **What You Get:**
|
||||
> - Private, secure cloud infrastructure
|
||||
> - Dramatic cost savings (up to 10x less expensive)
|
||||
> - Complete control over data and applications
|
||||
> - Seamless integration with existing systems
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Next Steps:**
|
||||
> - Technical requirements assessment
|
||||
> - Proof of concept deployment
|
||||
> - Migration planning and execution
|
||||
> - Ongoing support and optimization
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Information We Need:**
|
||||
> - Current infrastructure and pain points
|
||||
> - Technical requirements and constraints
|
||||
> - Compliance and security needs
|
||||
> - Migration timeline and priorities
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Telecom/ISP Section
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Edge computing and network extension opportunities.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **For Telecom Companies & ISPs**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **What You Get:**
|
||||
> - Edge computing capabilities for your customers
|
||||
> - New revenue streams from compute and storage
|
||||
> - Reduced backhaul costs and improved performance
|
||||
> - Competitive advantage in the market
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Next Steps:**
|
||||
> - Network integration planning
|
||||
> - Pilot deployment in key locations
|
||||
> - Customer onboarding and training
|
||||
> - Revenue sharing optimization
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Information We Need:**
|
||||
> - Network coverage and infrastructure
|
||||
> - Customer base and requirements
|
||||
> - Technical integration capabilities
|
||||
> - Business model preferences
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Investor/Partner Section
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Ecosystem participation and partnership opportunities.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **For Investors & Strategic Partners**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **What You Get:**
|
||||
> - Participation in the growing decentralized infrastructure market
|
||||
> - Access to revolutionary technology and IP
|
||||
> - Partnership opportunities across the ecosystem
|
||||
> - Exposure to multiple revenue streams
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Next Steps:**
|
||||
> - Strategic discussion and due diligence
|
||||
> - Partnership structure development
|
||||
> - Investment or collaboration agreement
|
||||
> - Joint go-to-market planning
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Information We Need:**
|
||||
> - Investment focus and criteria
|
||||
> - Strategic objectives and synergies
|
||||
> - Timeline and commitment level
|
||||
> - Preferred partnership structure
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Individual/Community Section
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Accessible entry point for individuals and communities.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **For Individuals & Communities**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **What You Get:**
|
||||
> - Start earning from your spare compute capacity
|
||||
> - Contribute to a more resilient internet
|
||||
> - Access to sovereign digital services
|
||||
> - Community ownership and participation
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Next Steps:**
|
||||
> - Order your first Tier-H node
|
||||
> - Simple setup and configuration
|
||||
> - Join the community network
|
||||
> - Scale as you grow
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Information We Need:**
|
||||
> - Location and connectivity
|
||||
> - Technical comfort level
|
||||
> - Goals and expectations
|
||||
> - Community involvement interest
|
||||
|
||||
### 9. Contact Form
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Comprehensive form that adapts based on selection.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Tell Us About Your Interest**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Required Information:**
|
||||
> - Name and organization
|
||||
> - Email and phone
|
||||
> - Interest category (from above)
|
||||
> - Location/jurisdiction
|
||||
> - Timeline for deployment
|
||||
> - Brief description of requirements
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Optional Information:**
|
||||
> - Current infrastructure details
|
||||
> - Budget parameters
|
||||
> - Specific technical requirements
|
||||
> - Preferred contact method
|
||||
> - Additional comments or questions
|
||||
|
||||
### 10. What Happens Next
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Clear expectations about the follow-up process.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **What Happens After You Submit:**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Within 24 Hours:**
|
||||
> - Confirmation email with next steps
|
||||
> - Assignment to appropriate specialist
|
||||
> - Initial resource package delivery
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Within 1 Week:**
|
||||
> - Personalized consultation call
|
||||
> - Custom proposal or assessment
|
||||
> - Technical documentation package
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Ongoing:**
|
||||
> - Regular updates on technology developments
|
||||
> - Invitation to community events and webinars
|
||||
> - Access to exclusive resources and content
|
||||
|
||||
### 11. Frequently Asked Questions
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Address common concerns and objections.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Common Questions:**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Q: What's the minimum investment to get started?**
|
||||
> A: Tier-H nodes start at under $5,000. Tier-S deployments vary based on scale and requirements.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Q: How long does deployment take?**
|
||||
> A: Tier-H nodes can be deployed in minutes. Tier-S datacenters typically deploy in 3-6 months.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Q: What kind of support do you provide?**
|
||||
> A: Comprehensive support from planning through deployment and ongoing operations.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Q: Is the technology proven?**
|
||||
> A: Yes, with 2000+ nodes deployed globally and years of production experience.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Q: How do I know this will work for my use case?**
|
||||
> A: We offer pilot programs and proof-of-concept deployments to validate fit.
|
||||
|
||||
### 12. Social Proof & Urgency
|
||||
|
||||
* **What we say:** Build confidence and create urgency.
|
||||
* **Extracted Text:**
|
||||
> **Join Leading Organizations Already Building the Future:**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Current Deployments:**
|
||||
> - 70+ countries with active infrastructure
|
||||
> - Government agencies building sovereign systems
|
||||
> - Enterprises reducing cloud costs by 10x
|
||||
> - Communities creating local digital resilience
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Limited Availability:**
|
||||
> - Priority access for early partners
|
||||
> - Exclusive pricing for first deployments
|
||||
> - Limited technical support capacity
|
||||
> - Growing demand for deployment slots
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Don't Wait - The Future is Being Built Now**
|
BIN
specs/blogs/openfuture/ai_stack_closed_today_visualization.jpeg
Normal file
BIN
specs/blogs/openfuture/ai_stack_closed_today_visualization.jpeg
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 1.4 MiB |
BIN
specs/blogs/openfuture/closed_world_datacenter_illustration.jpeg
Normal file
BIN
specs/blogs/openfuture/closed_world_datacenter_illustration.jpeg
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 1.1 MiB |
45
specs/blogs/openfuture/image_inventory.md
Normal file
45
specs/blogs/openfuture/image_inventory.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
|
||||
# OpenFuture Images Inventory
|
||||
|
||||
## Downloaded Images
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Timeline of Open Computing
|
||||
- **File**: `timeline_of_open_computing.jpeg` (19.7 KB)
|
||||
- **Description**: Visual timeline showing the evolution of computing technologies with various hardware and software icons
|
||||
- **Usage**: Illustrates the historical progression of open computing technologies
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Detailed Timeline Chart Computing Evolution
|
||||
- **File**: `detailed_timeline_chart_computing_evolution.jpeg` (60.8 KB)
|
||||
- **Description**: Comprehensive timeline chart from 1950-2020 showing computing eras (Mainframes, Minicomp, PC, Browser, Mobile, Cloud, AI) with key technologies and milestones
|
||||
- **Usage**: Shows the detailed progression and key events in computing history
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Closed World Datacenter Illustration
|
||||
- **File**: `closed_world_datacenter_illustration.jpeg` (1.1 MB)
|
||||
- **Description**: 3D isometric illustration of a data center infrastructure representing the closed world concept
|
||||
- **Usage**: Visual representation for Part 2 "A Closed World" section
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Innovation Ownership Comparison Diagram
|
||||
- **File**: `innovation_ownership_comparison_diagram.jpeg` (1.1 MB)
|
||||
- **Description**: Three-panel diagram comparing CLOSED, PROPRIETARY, and OPEN innovation models showing different customer/owner relationships
|
||||
- **Usage**: Illustrates who controls innovation in different system models
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Digital Landscape Transition Illustration
|
||||
- **File**: `digital_landscape_transition_illustration.jpeg` (1.4 MB)
|
||||
- **Description**: Artistic landscape illustration with digital/technological elements, appears to be a section transition image
|
||||
- **Usage**: Visual transition between sections, represents the bridge between closed and open worlds
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. AI Stack Closed Today Visualization
|
||||
- **File**: `ai_stack_closed_today_visualization.jpeg` (1.4 MB)
|
||||
- **Description**: Interactive visualization showing the current AI stack with layers from Silicon & Data Centers to ML Toolchain to End User, with mixed open/closed components
|
||||
- **Usage**: Shows the current state of AI infrastructure with closed and proprietary elements
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. AI Stack Open Future Visualization
|
||||
- **File**: `ai_stack_open_future_visualization.jpeg` (1.4 MB)
|
||||
- **Description**: Same AI stack visualization but showing all layers as open (blue pattern) representing the envisioned open future
|
||||
- **Usage**: Contrasts with the closed version to show the vision of a fully open AI stack
|
||||
|
||||
## Image Quality and Formats
|
||||
- All images are available in both JPEG and WebP formats
|
||||
- High resolution images (3840x2560 for most illustrations)
|
||||
- Suitable for inclusion in documents and presentations
|
||||
- Total collection size: ~8.5 MB (JPEG versions)
|
||||
|
318
specs/blogs/openfuture/openfuture.md
Normal file
318
specs/blogs/openfuture/openfuture.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
|
||||
# Open Future: Mapping the Open Territory
|
||||
|
||||
*A comprehensive exploration of the future of AI and computing through the lens of open versus closed systems*
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
AI is changing the laws that once governed computing. We stand at a critical juncture where the choices made today will determine whether AI becomes a force for democratization or concentration. This document explores the evolution of computing, the risks of closed systems, and the promise of an open future.
|
||||
|
||||
As Andrej Karpathy said, AI is literally "Software 2.0" - it isn't just an efficiency gain like previous revolutions. AI creates knowledge that we didn't have before and can navigate nearly inconceivable amounts of data and complexity. It will ask questions we didn't even know to ask, destroy previous industries, and create new ones.
|
||||
|
||||
The fundamental question we face is whether AI will follow the historical trend of falling costs and broadening access, or whether it will represent the first computing revolution that concentrates rather than democratizes access to technology.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Part 1: How We Got Here - The Evolution of Computing
|
||||
|
||||
### The Historical Pattern of Computing Revolutions
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Until recently, Bell's Law gave us an accurate framework for understanding computing revolutions, stating that each decade a new class of computing emerges, resulting in a fundamental shift in access. This pattern has been remarkably consistent throughout the history of computing.
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
The progression has been clear and transformative:
|
||||
|
||||
- **1950s: Mainframes** - Univac, IC Chip technology
|
||||
- **1960s: Minicomputers** - 12-bit PDP-8, DRAM, IBM Anti-trust Lawsuit
|
||||
- **1970s: Personal Computers** - Intel 4004, Minitel, Unix
|
||||
- **1980s: Browser Era** - World Wide Web, Linux, Mozilla
|
||||
- **1990s: Mobile** - iPhone, "Open Source" movement, Ethernet
|
||||
- **2000s: Cloud** - Android, Red Hat IPO, PCIe
|
||||
- **2010s: AI** - ChatGPT3, DeepSeek, RISC-V, Red Hat acquisition by IBM
|
||||
|
||||
### The Accessibility Revolution
|
||||
|
||||
These revolutions allowed us to make computers that were much more accessible, simultaneously driving performance up 10x while also driving cost down 10x. In 1981, a fully loaded IBM PC cost $4,500. Today, an iPhone, which is many millions of times faster, retails for $1,129. Through this process, we became exceptionally good at building very powerful computers with very small chips.
|
||||
|
||||
Every shift created new leaders, sidelined old ones, and required adaptation. From a social perspective, these innovations gave many more people access to compute, democratizing technology and expanding opportunities.
|
||||
|
||||
### The AI Exception: Breaking Bell's Law
|
||||
|
||||
However, something different is happening with Artificial Intelligence. Prices aren't dropping with the advent of AI. While cost per math operation is going down, the actual cost of inference per token is still climbing as models are getting larger (e.g., GPT4.5), doing more work (e.g., "reasoning models"), and doing work that is more intensive (e.g., new image generation).
|
||||
|
||||
AI datacenters are orders of magnitude more powerful than previous generations, with spending rising by tens of billions year-over-year. Even if we eventually see some cost reductions, it will take time before they reach affordability, leaving everyone besides a few in the dust of the AI revolution.
|
||||
|
||||
### Why AI is Different
|
||||
|
||||
Why is this computer class more expensive? AI is extremely physically intensive, requiring more silicon, more energy, and more resources. From shifting the physics of compute at the transistor level to building out the global infrastructure of AI data centers, this revolution is pushing against the physical limitations of human industry.
|
||||
|
||||
This physical intensity creates a fundamental challenge: if Bell's Law breaks fully, AI will be the first computing revolution that doesn't increase access, but instead concentrates it.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Part 2: A Closed World - The Risks of Concentration
|
||||
|
||||
### Historical Precedent: We've Been Here Before
|
||||
|
||||
This isn't the first time we've been presented with a choice between a closed or open future. In fact, we're living in a closed world today because of choices made for us 40+ years ago. Early minicomputer and PC culture was dominated by a hacker ethos defined by "access to computers... and the Hands-On Imperative."
|
||||
|
||||
By the late 90s and early 00s, PC development became dominated by Windows and Intel at the cost of limiting innovation while hamstringing competitors and partners alike.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Economics of Closed Systems
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
The diagram above illustrates three different models of innovation ownership:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **CLOSED**: No leverage or choice in dealings - complete vertical ownership
|
||||
2. **PROPRIETARY**: No control of roadmap or features while incurring higher development and product costs
|
||||
3. **OPEN**: You drive and control the future through open foundations and collaborative development
|
||||
|
||||
### Real-World Examples of Market Concentration
|
||||
|
||||
Just look at WinTel's OEM partners, like Compaq, which struggled to hit 5% operating margins in the late 90s, according to SEC filings. Dell, during the same time period, absolutely revolutionized supply chains and typically enjoyed margins around 10%.
|
||||
|
||||
Compare this to Microsoft and Intel, which often tripled or quadrupled those figures in the same period, with Microsoft hitting 50.2% margins in 1999. Some have jokingly referred to this as "drug dealer margins." In 2001, Windows had >90% market share, and almost 25 years later, it still has >70% market share.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Formation of "Swamps"
|
||||
|
||||
How do closed worlds form? One word: **swamps**. A swamp is a moat gone stagnant from incumbents who have forgotten how to innovate.
|
||||
|
||||
There are many ways to produce a swamp:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Overcomplication**: Protecting a product by adding unnecessary proprietary systems and layers of abstraction
|
||||
- **License Fees**: Charging rents in the form of licensing costs
|
||||
- **Feature Bloat**: Piling on features just enough to justify upgrades while staying disconnected from actual needs
|
||||
- **Bundling**: Offering something "for free" as an inseparable part of a bundled service to lock out competition
|
||||
|
||||
However it happens, what started as innovation becomes just an extra tax on the product, erecting monopolies instead of creating real value. These companies become incentivized to preserve the status quo rather than changing.
|
||||
|
||||
### The AI Concentration Risk
|
||||
|
||||
Today, many companies are forced into choosing closed systems because they don't know of, or can't imagine, an alternative. Industry leaders see the sector as a tight competition between a few established incumbents and a handful of well-funded startups. We're seeing consolidation in the market, accompanied by a huge increase in total market value.
|
||||
|
||||
If Bell's Law breaks fully, AI will be the first computing revolution that doesn't increase access, but instead concentrates it. We saw hints of this concentration effect with the previous computer class. Jonathan Zittrain argues that the cloud has put accessibility at risk, leaving "new gatekeepers in place, with us and them prisoner to their limited business plans and to regulators who fear things that are new and disruptive."
|
||||
|
||||
Unlike hyperscalers before it, AI threatens to tip consolidation into full enclosure.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Stakes: A Referendum on Society's Future
|
||||
|
||||
If AI eats everything, like software has eaten everything, this means that open versus closed is a referendum on the future shape of society as a whole. A handful of companies will own the means of intelligence production, and everyone else will purchase access at whatever price they set. As many have warned, this will represent a new form of social stratification.
|
||||
|
||||
**It is clear to us that open is existential.**
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Part 3: An Open World - The Promise of Open Systems
|
||||
|
||||
### The Infiltration Power of Open Source
|
||||
|
||||
Open source has a way of infiltrating crucial computing applications. The internet runs on it. The entire AI research stack uses open source frameworks. Even proprietary tech relies on it, with 90% of Fortune 500 companies using open source software. There wouldn't be macOS without BSD Unix, Azure without Linux, or Netflix without FFmpeg.
|
||||
|
||||
### Historical Success of Open Standards
|
||||
|
||||
Open source and its hardware equivalent, open standards, have repeatedly catalyzed mass adoption by reducing friction and enabling interoperability:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ethernet**: Robert Metcalf says the openness of ethernet allowed it to beat rival standards
|
||||
- **DRAM**: Enabled the mass adoption of PCs with high-capacity, low-cost memory
|
||||
- **PCIe**: Enabled high-speed interoperability of PC components
|
||||
- **Open Compute Project**: Used by Meta and Microsoft among others, standardized rack and server design so components could be modular and vendor-agnostic
|
||||
|
||||
### RISC-V: The Hardware Equivalent of Linux for AI
|
||||
|
||||
**RISC-V is the hardware equivalent of Linux for AI hardware.** It launched in 2010 at UC Berkeley as a free, open standard alternative to proprietary architectures like Intel's x86 and ARM.
|
||||
|
||||
Key advantages of RISC-V:
|
||||
- **Open Nature**: Allows deep customization, making it especially desirable for AI and edge computing applications
|
||||
- **Royalty-Free**: No licensing costs or restrictions
|
||||
- **Growing Adoption**: Companies from Google to Tenstorrent are adopting it for custom silicon
|
||||
- **Flexibility**: Its ISA (Instruction Set Architecture) is gaining incredible adoption across the industry
|
||||
|
||||
### The Global Talent Pool Advantage
|
||||
|
||||
Open systems also attract a global talent pool. Linux itself is the shining example of this, constructed by thousands of engineers, with significant contributions coming both from independent outsiders and employees of major players like Intel and Google.
|
||||
|
||||
This collaborative approach creates several benefits:
|
||||
- **Diverse Perspectives**: Contributors from around the world bring different viewpoints and solutions
|
||||
- **Rapid Innovation**: Multiple teams working on problems simultaneously accelerates development
|
||||
- **Quality Assurance**: More eyes on the code means better security and fewer bugs
|
||||
- **Knowledge Sharing**: Open development spreads expertise across the entire community
|
||||
|
||||
### The Default State of Technology
|
||||
|
||||
We believe **open is the default state** – what remains when artificial boundaries fall away. The only question is how long those boundaries hold, and how much progress will be delayed in the meantime.
|
||||
|
||||
But we can't assume that we'll return to the historical trend of falling costs and broadening access. We're at a critical juncture. As companies build out their AI stack, they are making a choice today that will determine the future. Companies can invest in closed systems, further concentrating leverage in the hands of a few players, or they can retain agency by investing in open systems, which are affordable, transparent, and modifiable.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## The AI Stack: Current Reality vs. Open Future
|
||||
|
||||
### The Current State: Closed Today
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Today, parts of the AI stack are open, parts are closed, and parts have yet to be decided. Let's examine the current state across the different layers:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Hardware Layer
|
||||
**Status: CLOSED**
|
||||
|
||||
Most hardware today is a black box, literally. You're reliant on a company to fix, optimize, and, at times, even implement your workloads. This creates several problems:
|
||||
- **Vendor Lock-in**: Organizations become dependent on specific hardware vendors
|
||||
- **Limited Customization**: Unable to optimize hardware for specific use cases
|
||||
- **High Switching Costs**: Moving between vendors requires significant investment
|
||||
- **Innovation Bottlenecks**: Progress limited by vendor roadmaps and priorities
|
||||
|
||||
#### Low-Level Software Layer
|
||||
**Status: CLOSED**
|
||||
|
||||
Most parallelization software is proprietary, causing unnecessary lock-in and massive switching costs:
|
||||
- **Proprietary APIs**: Vendor-specific programming interfaces
|
||||
- **Limited Portability**: Code written for one platform doesn't easily transfer
|
||||
- **Optimization Constraints**: Unable to modify software for specific needs
|
||||
- **Dependency Risks**: Reliance on vendor support and updates
|
||||
|
||||
#### Models Layer
|
||||
**Status: MIXED**
|
||||
|
||||
Models present a complex landscape, but most leading ones are closed:
|
||||
- **Leading Models**: GPT-4, Claude, and other state-of-the-art models are proprietary
|
||||
- **Open Models**: Available but often with limited data, little support, and no guarantees of remaining open
|
||||
- **Training Data**: Most closed models use proprietary training datasets
|
||||
- **Future Uncertainty**: Open models may become closed as companies seek monetization
|
||||
|
||||
#### Applications Layer
|
||||
**Status: CLOSED**
|
||||
|
||||
Even applications using open source models are typically built using cloud platform APIs:
|
||||
- **Data Pooling**: Your data is being used to train next-generation models
|
||||
- **API Dependencies**: Applications rely on cloud services for functionality
|
||||
- **Privacy Concerns**: User interactions contribute to model improvement
|
||||
- **Control Loss**: Limited ability to modify or customize application behavior
|
||||
|
||||
### The Vision: Open Future
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
The open future represents a fundamental shift where all layers of the AI stack become open, collaborative, and user-controlled. This transformation would create:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Open Hardware
|
||||
- **RISC-V Adoption**: Open instruction set architectures enabling custom silicon
|
||||
- **Modular Design**: Interoperable components from multiple vendors
|
||||
- **Community Development**: Collaborative hardware design and optimization
|
||||
- **Cost Reduction**: Competition and standardization driving down prices
|
||||
|
||||
#### Open Software Stack
|
||||
- **Open Parallelization**: Community-developed software for distributed computing
|
||||
- **Portable Code**: Applications that run across different hardware platforms
|
||||
- **Transparent Optimization**: Ability to modify and improve software performance
|
||||
- **Collaborative Development**: Global community contributing to improvements
|
||||
|
||||
#### Open Models
|
||||
- **Transparent Training**: Open datasets and training methodologies
|
||||
- **Community Models**: Collaboratively developed and maintained AI models
|
||||
- **Customization Freedom**: Ability to fine-tune and modify models for specific needs
|
||||
- **Guaranteed Openness**: Governance structures ensuring models remain open
|
||||
|
||||
#### Open Applications
|
||||
- **User Control**: Applications that respect user privacy and data ownership
|
||||
- **Local Processing**: Ability to run AI applications without cloud dependencies
|
||||
- **Customizable Interfaces**: Applications that can be modified for specific use cases
|
||||
- **Data Sovereignty**: Users maintain control over their data and its usage
|
||||
|
||||
### The Domino Effect of Opening Hardware
|
||||
|
||||
Opening up AI hardware, with open standards like RISC-V, and its associated software would trigger a domino effect upstream. It would enable "a world where mainstream technology can be influenced, even revolutionized, out of left field."
|
||||
|
||||
This means a richer future with more experimentation and more breakthroughs we can barely imagine today, such as:
|
||||
- **Personalized Cancer Vaccines**: AI-driven medical treatments tailored to individual patients
|
||||
- **Natural Disaster Prediction**: Advanced modeling for early warning systems
|
||||
- **Abundant Energy**: AI-optimized renewable energy systems and distribution
|
||||
- **Educational Democratization**: Personalized learning systems accessible globally
|
||||
- **Scientific Discovery**: AI assistants accelerating research across all disciplines
|
||||
|
||||
And this world gets here a lot faster outside of a swamp.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion: The Choice That Defines Our Future
|
||||
|
||||
### The Silicon Valley Paradox
|
||||
|
||||
There's an old Silicon Valley adage: "If you aren't paying, you are the product." In AI, we've been paying steeply for the product, but we still are the product. We have collectively generated the information being used to train AI, and we're feeding it more every day.
|
||||
|
||||
This creates a fundamental paradox: we're both the customers and the raw material for AI systems, yet we have little control over how these systems develop or how they're used.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Stakes: Who Owns Intelligence?
|
||||
|
||||
In a closed world, AI owns everything, and that AI is owned by a few. This concentration of power represents more than just market dominance – it's about who controls the means of intelligence production in the 21st century.
|
||||
|
||||
The implications are profound:
|
||||
- **Economic Control**: A handful of companies setting prices for access to intelligence
|
||||
- **Innovation Bottlenecks**: Progress limited by the priorities and capabilities of a few organizations
|
||||
- **Social Stratification**: New forms of inequality based on access to AI capabilities
|
||||
- **Democratic Concerns**: Concentration of power in private entities with limited accountability
|
||||
|
||||
### The Open Alternative
|
||||
|
||||
Opening up hardware and software means a future where AI doesn't own you. Instead:
|
||||
- **Distributed Innovation**: Thousands of organizations and individuals contributing to AI development
|
||||
- **Competitive Markets**: Multiple providers driving down costs and improving quality
|
||||
- **User Agency**: Individuals and organizations maintaining control over their AI systems
|
||||
- **Transparent Development**: Open processes that can be audited and understood by the community
|
||||
|
||||
### The Critical Juncture
|
||||
|
||||
We stand at a critical juncture in the history of computing. The decisions made today about AI infrastructure will echo for decades to come. Companies building out their AI stack are making choices that will determine whether we get:
|
||||
|
||||
**A Closed Future:**
|
||||
- Concentrated power in the hands of a few tech giants
|
||||
- High costs and limited access to AI capabilities
|
||||
- Innovation controlled by corporate priorities
|
||||
- Users as products rather than empowered participants
|
||||
|
||||
**Or an Open Future:**
|
||||
- Democratized access to AI tools and capabilities
|
||||
- Competitive innovation driving rapid progress
|
||||
- User control and privacy protection
|
||||
- AI as a tool for human flourishing rather than corporate control
|
||||
|
||||
### The Path Forward
|
||||
|
||||
The writing is on the wall for AI. We are veering towards a closed world where the constellation of technology companies are fighting over scraps. Competition, innovation, and sustainable business can't thrive in this low-oxygen environment.
|
||||
|
||||
But there is another path. By choosing open standards like RISC-V, supporting open source AI frameworks, and demanding transparency in AI development, we can ensure that the AI revolution follows the historical pattern of democratization rather than concentration.
|
||||
|
||||
### A Call to Action
|
||||
|
||||
The choice is not just for technology companies – it's for everyone who will be affected by AI, which is to say, everyone. We must:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Support Open Standards**: Choose products and services built on open foundations
|
||||
2. **Demand Transparency**: Require visibility into how AI systems work and make decisions
|
||||
3. **Invest in Open Development**: Fund and contribute to open source AI projects
|
||||
4. **Advocate for Open Policies**: Support regulations that promote competition and openness
|
||||
5. **Build Open Communities**: Participate in collaborative development of AI technologies
|
||||
|
||||
### The Default State
|
||||
|
||||
We believe open is the default state – what remains when artificial boundaries fall away. The only question is how long those boundaries hold, and how much progress will be delayed in the meantime.
|
||||
|
||||
The future of AI – and by extension, the future of human society in the age of artificial intelligence – depends on the choices we make today. We can choose a future where AI serves humanity broadly, or we can accept a future where humanity serves AI's corporate owners.
|
||||
|
||||
**The choice is ours, but we must make it now.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*This document is based on content from [OpenFuture by Tenstorrent](https://openfuture.tenstorrent.com/), exploring the critical importance of open systems in the age of artificial intelligence.*
|
||||
|
105
specs/blogs/openfuture/openfuture_content.md
Normal file
105
specs/blogs/openfuture/openfuture_content.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
|
||||
# Open Future - Initial Content
|
||||
|
||||
## Main Theme
|
||||
AI is changing the laws that once governed computing.
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline of OPEN
|
||||
- 1950: Mainframes, Univac, IC Chip
|
||||
- 1960: Minicomp, 12-bit PDP-8, DRAM, IBM Anti-trust Lawsuit
|
||||
- 1970: PC, Intel 4004, Minitel, Unix
|
||||
- 1980: Browser, WWW, Linux, Mozilla
|
||||
- 1990: Mobile, iPhone, "Open Source", Ethernet
|
||||
- 2000: Cloud, ChatGPT3, Android, Red Hat IPO
|
||||
- 2010: AI, DeepSeek, PCIe, Red Hat Sells To IBM, RISC-V
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Ideas
|
||||
|
||||
### The Critical Juncture
|
||||
AI is valuable enough to warrant massive investment. As Andrej Karpathy said, it's "Software 2.0". AI creates knowledge that we didn't have before and can navigate inconceivable amounts of data and complexity.
|
||||
|
||||
Companies are making choices today that will determine the future - between closed systems (concentrating leverage) or open systems (affordable, transparent, modifiable).
|
||||
|
||||
### The Risk of Concentration
|
||||
If Bell's Law breaks fully, AI will be the first computing revolution that doesn't increase access, but instead concentrates it. This threatens to tip consolidation into full enclosure.
|
||||
|
||||
### Open as Existential
|
||||
"It is clear to us that open is existential."
|
||||
|
||||
If AI eats everything, then open versus closed is a referendum on the future shape of society as a whole.
|
||||
|
||||
### RISC-V as the Hardware Equivalent of Linux
|
||||
RISC-V launched in 2010 at UC Berkeley as a free, open standard alternative to proprietary architectures. It's gaining incredible adoption from companies like Google and Tenstorrent.
|
||||
|
||||
### The AI Stack Analysis
|
||||
Current state shows parts open, parts closed:
|
||||
- Hardware: CLOSED (black box, reliant on companies)
|
||||
- Low Level software: CLOSED (proprietary parallelization software)
|
||||
- Models: MIXED (leading ones closed, open ones limited)
|
||||
- Applications: CLOSED (even with open models, built using cloud APIs)
|
||||
|
||||
### The Vision
|
||||
Opening up AI hardware with open standards like RISC-V would trigger a domino effect upstream, enabling "a world where mainstream technology can be influenced, even revolutionized, out of left field."
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Part 1: How We Got Here
|
||||
|
||||
### Bell's Law and Computing Evolution
|
||||
Until recently, Bell's Law gave us an accurate frame for understanding computing revolutions, stating that each decade a new class of computing emerges, resulting in a fundamental shift in access.
|
||||
|
||||
We went from mainframes in the 1950s, to minicomputers in the 1960s, to super computers in the 1970s, to personal computers in the 1980s, to the world-wide web in the 1990s, and mobile in the 2000s.
|
||||
|
||||
These revolutions allowed us to make computers that were much more accessible – simultaneously driving performance up 10x while also driving cost down 10x. In 1981, a fully loaded IBM PC cost $4500. Today, an iPhone, which is many millions of times faster, retails for $1,129. Through this process we got very good at building very powerful computers with very small chips.
|
||||
|
||||
### The AI Revolution Challenge
|
||||
However, prices aren't dropping with the advent of Artificial Intelligence. While cost per math operation is going down, the actual cost of inference per token is still climbing as models are getting larger (e.g. GPT4.5), doing more work (e.g. "reasoning models"), and doing work that is more intensive (e.g. new image generation). AI datacenters are orders of magnitude more powerful than previous generations with spending rising by tens of billions year-over-year.
|
||||
|
||||
Why is this computer class more expensive? AI is extremely physically intensive – requiring more silicon, more energy, more resources. From shifting the physics of compute at the transistor level to building out the global infrastructure of AI data centers, this revolution is pushing against the physical limitations of human industry.
|
||||
|
||||
## Part 2: A Closed World
|
||||
|
||||
### The Historical Pattern
|
||||
This isn't the first time we've been presented with a choice between a closed or open future. In fact, we're living in a closed world today because of choices made for us 40+ years ago. Early minicomputer and PC culture was dominated by a hacker ethos defined by "access to computers... and the Hands-On Imperative". By the late 90s and early 00s, PC development became dominated by Windows and Intel at the cost of limiting innovation while hamstringing competitors and partners alike.
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Concentration Examples
|
||||
Just look at WinTel's OEM partners, like Compaq, which struggled to hit 5% operating margins in the late 90s, according to SEC filings. Dell, during the same time period, absolutely revolutionized supply chains, and typically enjoyed margins around 10%. Compare this to Microsoft and Intel, which often tripled or quadrupled those figures in the same period, with Microsoft hitting 50.2% margins in 1999. Some have jokingly referred to this as drug dealer margins. In 2001, Windows had >90% market share, and almost 25 years later, it still has >70% market share.
|
||||
|
||||
### How Closed Worlds Form
|
||||
How do closed worlds form? One word: swamps. A swamp is a moat gone stagnant from incumbents who have forgotten how to innovate.
|
||||
|
||||
There are many ways to produce a swamp. They can protect a product by overcomplicating it, adding unnecessary proprietary systems and layers of abstraction. They can charge rents, in the form of license fees. They can pile on features just enough to justify an upgrade to customers, while staying disconnected from what they actually need. And if they want to get really clever, they can offer something "for free" as an inseparable part of a bundled service in order to lock out competition.
|
||||
|
||||
However it happens, what started as innovation becomes just an extra tax on the product, erecting monopolies instead of creating real value. These companies become incentivized to preserve the status quo, rather than changing.
|
||||
|
||||
## Part 3: An Open World
|
||||
|
||||
### The Power of Open Source
|
||||
Open source has a way of infiltrating crucial computing applications. The internet runs on it. The entire AI research stack uses open source frameworks. Even proprietary tech relies on it with 90% of Fortune 500 companies using open source software. There wouldn't be macOS without BSD Unix, Azure without Linux, or Netflix without FFmpeg.
|
||||
|
||||
### Open Standards and Mass Adoption
|
||||
Open source and its hardware equivalent, open standards, have repeatedly catalyzed mass adoption by reducing friction and enabling interoperability. Robert Metcalf says the openness of ethernet allowed it to beat rival standards. DRAM enabled the mass adoption of PCs with high-capacity, low-cost memory, while PCIe enabled high-speed interoperability of PC components. Similarly, Open Compute Project specs, used by Meta and Microsoft among others, standardized rack and server design, so components could be modular and vendor-agnostic.
|
||||
|
||||
### RISC-V: The Hardware Equivalent of Linux
|
||||
RISC-V is the hardware equivalent of Linux for AI hardware. It launched in 2010 at UC Berkeley as a free, open standard alternative to proprietary architectures like Intel's x86 and ARM. Its open nature allows it to be deeply customized, making it especially desirable for AI and edge computing applications, and it is royalty-free. RISC-V's ISA is gaining incredible adoption, with companies from Google to us at Tenstorrent adopting it for custom silicon.
|
||||
|
||||
### Global Talent Pool
|
||||
Open systems also attract a global talent pool. Linux itself is the shining example of this, constructed by thousands of engineers, with significant contributions coming both from independent outsiders and employees of major players like Intel and Google.
|
||||
|
||||
We believe open is the default state – what remains when artificial boundaries fall away. The only question is how long those boundaries hold, and how much progress will be delayed in the meantime.
|
||||
|
||||
## The AI Stack Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Current State (Closed Today)
|
||||
- **Hardware**: CLOSED - Most hardware today is a black box, literally. You're reliant on a company to fix, optimize, and, at times, even implement your workloads.
|
||||
- **Low Level software**: CLOSED - Most parallelization software is proprietary causing unnecessary lock-in and massive switching costs.
|
||||
- **Models**: MIXED - Models are mixed, but most of the leading ones are closed. The models that are open share limited data, with little to no support, and have no promises of staying open in the future.
|
||||
- **Applications**: CLOSED - Even if an application is using an open source model, most are built using cloud platform APIs. This means your data is being pooled to train the next gen models.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Vision (Open Future)
|
||||
Opening up AI hardware, with open standards like RISC-V, and its associated software would trigger a domino effect upstream. It would enable "a world where mainstream technology can be influenced, even revolutionized, out of left field." This means a richer future with more experimentation and more breakthroughs we can barely imagine today, like personalized cancer vaccines, natural disaster prediction, and abundant energy.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Stakes
|
||||
There's an old Silicon Valley adage – if you aren't paying you are the product. In AI, we've been paying steeply for the product, but we still are the product. We have collectively generated the information being used to train AI, and are feeding it more every day.
|
||||
|
||||
In a closed world, AI owns everything, and that AI is owned by a few. Opening up hardware and software means a future where AI doesn't own you.
|
||||
|
1195
specs/blogs/study.md
Normal file
1195
specs/blogs/study.md
Normal file
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
173
specs/tier-s-h.md
Normal file
173
specs/tier-s-h.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
|
||||
|
||||
# ThreeFold Tier-S & Tier-H Datacenters
|
||||
|
||||
## A better alternative to centralized datacenters
|
||||
|
||||
Digitally Empowered Real Estate — Resilient. Sustainable. Decentralized.
|
||||
|
||||
## What Is It?
|
||||
|
||||
ThreeFold introduces a new class of decentralized digital infrastructure:
|
||||
|
||||
* Tier-S: Modular, industrial-grade datacenters
|
||||
* Tier-H: Residential or office-scale nodes
|
||||
|
||||
Together, they form a planetary-scale AI and cloud grid, locally owned and operated.
|
||||
|
||||
Instead of relying on hyperscalers or centralized clouds, this system allows homes, buildings, and communities to host their own resilient, sovereign infrastructure.
|
||||
|
||||
## From Real Estate to Digital Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
Just like solar panels turn buildings into power generators, ThreeFold's Cloud Nodes turn them into digital utilities. These nodes produce:
|
||||
|
||||
* Compute, storage, and networking capacity
|
||||
* AI inference power
|
||||
* Recurring digital revenue
|
||||
|
||||
Compute is now one of the world’s most valuable resources. Sovereign infrastructure is the new standard. Your building can become a self-sustaining node in this new digital economy.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Why Real Estate Developers Should Join
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature | Benefit |
|
||||
| -- | |
|
||||
| Passive Digital Revenue | Monetize idle compute, bandwidth, and storage |
|
||||
| Higher Property Value | Market properties as cloud-enabled |
|
||||
| Green & Resilient | 10x less energy vs traditional datacenters |
|
||||
| Turnkey Deployment | No IT expertise required |
|
||||
| Sovereign Cloud | Data stays local and private |
|
||||
| Web3 & AI Ready | Compatible with modern applications |
|
||||
| Future-Proof | Supports Kubernetes, VR, digital twins, and Web3 |
|
||||
|
||||
Buildings equipped with Tier-H nodes offer faster, more private, and locally resilient digital services to residents.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## What Are Tier-S and Tier-H?
|
||||
|
||||
### Tier-S Datacenters
|
||||
|
||||
* Modular data containers
|
||||
* Handle over 1 million transactions per second
|
||||
* Support 100,000+ users per unit
|
||||
* Suitable for industrial-scale AI and cloud
|
||||
* Cyberpandemic- and disaster-resilient
|
||||
* Deployed in under six months
|
||||
|
||||
### Tier-H Datacenters
|
||||
|
||||
* Nodes deployed in homes, offices, and mixed-use spaces
|
||||
* Provide full compute, storage, and networking
|
||||
* Host AI workloads, Web2/Web3 applications, and Kubernetes clusters
|
||||
* Plug-and-play installation, zero maintenance
|
||||
* Ultra energy-efficient (<10W per node)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Who It’s For
|
||||
|
||||
* Governments building sovereign AI and cloud infrastructure
|
||||
* Telecoms and ISPs deploying local compute grids
|
||||
* Developers and startups seeking cloud independence
|
||||
* AI and Web3 companies hosting inference or full-stack apps
|
||||
* Communities seeking plug-and-play digital resilience
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## How the System Works
|
||||
|
||||
1. Install a Tier-H node in your home, office, or property or Tier-S for the bigger scale
|
||||
2. It joins the ThreeFold Grid — a decentralized AI and cloud network
|
||||
3. It automatically contributes compute, storage, and networking
|
||||
4. Earn digital rewards as others use your node
|
||||
5. The node is self-managing and stateless, powered by Zero-OS
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Tier-H vs Traditional vs Blockchain Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature | Traditional Cloud | Blockchain Node | Tier-H/S Node |
|
||||
| -- | -- | | - |
|
||||
| Deployment | Centralized | L1 Network Only | Local (Edge) |
|
||||
| Sovereignty | Low | Partial | Full |
|
||||
| Energy Use | High (>100W) | Variable | Depending workload can be 10x less |
|
||||
| Complexity | Requires IT Team | Developer Setup | Zero-touch |
|
||||
| AI Ready | Yes | No | Yes |
|
||||
| Use Cases | Enterprise | Tokens | Web2, Web3, AI, Education |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## The Real Estate Advantage
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Tier-H/S Enabled | Traditional |
|
||||
| | - | - |
|
||||
| ROI | Up to 3x Higher | Standard CAPEX |
|
||||
| Energy Cost | Upto 10x Less depending workload | High Consumption |
|
||||
| Deployment Time | Months | 12–36 Months |
|
||||
| Tenant Demand | Digital Infrastructure | Declining Footprint |
|
||||
|
||||
Tier-H/S enables property developers to transform unused space into a source of digital yield.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Real Cost Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
| Service | ThreeFold | Other Providers |
|
||||
| | - | - |
|
||||
| Storage (1TB + 100GB Transfer) | Less than \$5/month | \$12–\$160/month |
|
||||
| Compute (2 vCPU, 4GB RAM) | Less than \$12/month | \$20–\$100/month |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Built-In AI & Cloud Stack
|
||||
|
||||
* Quantum-safe storage
|
||||
* Zero-OS: stateless, Linux-based operating system
|
||||
* Mesh networking via the Mycelium protocol
|
||||
* Autonomous management via 3BOTs
|
||||
* Neuromorphic AI compatibility
|
||||
* Fully open-source, developer-friendly
|
||||
|
||||
Supports AI, Web2/Web3 apps, digital twins, IoT, and metaverse environments.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Why This Matters
|
||||
|
||||
| Problem | Solution |
|
||||
| -- | |
|
||||
| Centralized, fragile infrastructure | Distributed, self-healing network |
|
||||
| Vendor lock-in and surveillance | Locally owned sovereign cloud |
|
||||
| High energy consumption | Ultra-efficient nodes |
|
||||
| Slow deployment and high costs | Fast, local, low-CAPEX rollout |
|
||||
| Economic extraction | Local value creation through digital services |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Stack for Developers
|
||||
|
||||
* Native Linux and Kubernetes support
|
||||
* Bring your own stack or use ThreeFold’s tools
|
||||
* Zero-OS ensures secure, stateless, self-healing operations
|
||||
* Ideal for AI, education, IoT, and digital infrastructure applications
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Adoption at a Glance
|
||||
|
||||
* Live in over 50 countries
|
||||
* Live Grid Stats: [https://stats.grid.tf](https://stats.grid.tf)
|
||||
* 60,000+ CPU cores active
|
||||
* Over 1 million contracts processed on-chain
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Why now
|
||||
|
||||
Whether you are a developer, real estate investor, digital sovereignty advocate, or government strategist — you can be part of building the future.
|
||||
|
||||
* Host a Tier-H Node — earn, secure, and contribute to the internet
|
||||
* Deploy a Tier-S Datacenter — scale sovereign cloud for your region
|
||||
|
||||
Let’s build the most resilient, inclusive, and intelligent internet — together.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user